﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Millisecond Forums » Millisecond Forums » Inquisit 4  » Inquist 4 + BIOPAC (MP150) = biofeedback?</title><generator>InstantForum 2017-1 Final</generator><description>Millisecond Forums</description><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/</link><webMaster>Millisecond Forums</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 22:56:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Inquist 4 + BIOPAC (MP150) = biofeedback?</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic11119.aspx</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I plan to run a training that decreases a potentially existing incongruence between subjective and physiological reactions to emotions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For this purpose, I will presents emotional expressions to participants and subsequently ask them to indicate their own emotional reactions to them (using Inquisit 4). In parallel, I am going to record expression-contingent changes in skin conductance level (SCL) and heart rate (using BIOPAC MP 150) and I would like to feedback these physiological changes e.g. an increase in SCL to the participants within an Inquisit-trial (e.g. a feedback trial that shows both reactions (subjective statement + physiological changes) on the same screen within the Inquisit experiment). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most importantly, I need to know, whether it is technically possible to export BIOPAC signals in a form that Inquisit can read and integrate within a given trial (I have been thiniking about TTL-Signals, the stimulator function of MP150 (http://www.biopac.com/Manuals/acqknowledge%204%20software%20guide.pdf&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; p108ff), or the possibility to integrate BIOPAC data to SMI BeGaze or Noldus Observer). Has anybody hands-on experience with such a setup?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I am not a technican, I would very much appreciate any idea!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best ,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andy&lt;/p&gt;


</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 03:19:17 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>andy</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Inquist 4 + BIOPAC (MP150) = biofeedback?</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic11121.aspx</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dave,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thank you for your quick response. OK, I'll contact Biopac support for more information and keep you posted in case there is any solution for my concern.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andy&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 03:19:17 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>andy</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Inquist 4 + BIOPAC (MP150) = biofeedback?</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic11120.aspx</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I very much doubt that BIOPAC's Acq&lt;em&gt;Knowledge &lt;/em&gt;software is able to communicate its analysis results to any other application in real-time, much less via TTL signals. As far as I can see, the "Stimulator" options are designed to time-synch and/or trigger external equipment (e.g. a shock or tone generator), not to transfer complex state information / acquisition results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm pretty sure it can export to various applications (e.g. BeGaze) for data integration after the fact (i.e. not in real-time). However, I would recommend you take this up with BIOPAC support who certainly know their hard- and software capabilities better than I do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 02:28:01 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>