﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Millisecond Forums » Millisecond Forums » Inquisit 4  » d'prime - help needed!</title><generator>InstantForum 2017-1 Final</generator><description>Millisecond Forums</description><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/</link><webMaster>Millisecond Forums</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 23:53:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>d'prime - help needed!</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic15475.aspx</link><description>Hi,&lt;br/&gt;I am currently conducting a test (GO/No-GO Association Task) to examine the implicit attitude towards individuals with disabilities. I understand that typical GNAT requires the derivation of d'prime indices for each critical block in order to compare the association strengths between targets and attributes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, I would also like to quantify a single index for implicit attitude in order to run subsequent analyses looking at its relationship with explicit measure of attitude. I am uncertain of the best way to do so though. Should I run the analyses based on the difference score by subtracting d'prime(disabilties+plesant) from d'rime(disabilities+unpleasant)? Or would it be more desirable to conduct the analyses with either the d'prime of&amp;nbsp;(disabilities+pleasant) or (disabilities+unpleasant) alone? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am more inclined towards the latter idea because I feel that the d'prime for each block is distinct on its own as weaker association between disabilities+pleasant may not necessary translate to a stronger association between disabilities+unpleasant. I feel that both are on relatively different scale. However, I have seen literature which have collapse both d'primes by deriving a difference score to quantify an implicit attitude index.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyone can advice? Thank you in advance!</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 04:41:38 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>honglingggs</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: d'prime - help needed!</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic15481.aspx</link><description>I see no problem with computing a difference score. However, this is a methodological question completely unrelated to Inquisit, so there might be better venues for you to discuss this (e.g. mailing lists or fora dedicated to statistics and research methods).&lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 04:41:38 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: d'prime - help needed!</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic15480.aspx</link><description>Hi Dave,&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for your reply. What would you suggest then if I am interested to explore the relationship between the implicit measure and the explicit measure?&lt;br/&gt;I would definitely need to quantify an index for the implicit measure in this case and D score (for IAT) might not be ideal as GNAT involves response deadline.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Look forward to your reply.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 04:30:12 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>honglingggs</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: d'prime - help needed!</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic15479.aspx</link><description>My quick thoughts: d' is a dimensionless statistic, so -- by definition -- there is no issue of scale. (To be strict: d' does not represent association in the sense of, say, a correlation coefficient. d' reflects the separation between the means of the signal and noise distributions under assumptions of normality.)&lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 04:15:37 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>