﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Millisecond Forums » Millisecond Forums » Inquisit 4  » Layer objects</title><generator>InstantForum 2017-1 Final</generator><description>Millisecond Forums</description><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/</link><webMaster>Millisecond Forums</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 19:19:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Layer objects</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic19707.aspx</link><description>Hi everyone,&lt;br/&gt;I'm trying to order two shapes and a video object in a way that the shapes are 'on top'/'at front' and the video is 'on the bottom'/'at the back' (So it is partly hidden by the shapes). I've seen some reference from a couple of years ago in that topic regarding ordering the objects in a 'bottom to top' order through the stimulusframes attribute&lt;br/&gt;(for example &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;/stimulusframes = [10 = partlyHiddenObject, objectPartlyHidingOtherObject ;]&lt;/span&gt;), but for some reason it doesn't work for me.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you could take a look at this excrept and direct me towards the answer, i'd be thankful, currently the objects are layered but &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;vid_a_item&lt;/span&gt; is presented on top of &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;leftFlankRec &lt;/span&gt;and&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt; rightFlankRec&lt;/span&gt;, even though i've tried ordering them differently in the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;/stimulusframes&lt;/span&gt; attribute. This is the opposite of what i'm trying to achieve. &lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;span&gt;[center]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&amp;lt;trial lernen_a&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;/ ontrialbegin = [values.vid1 = list.vid_a_itemnumbers.nextvalue; ]&lt;br/&gt;/stimulusframes = [1 = maske, fixation; 66 = vid_a_item, rightFlankRec, leftFlankRec;]&lt;br/&gt;/trialduration = 1&lt;br/&gt;/recorddata = true&lt;br/&gt;/ontrialend = [values.datei = (video.vid_a_item.currentitem)]&lt;br/&gt;&amp;lt;/trial&amp;gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span&gt;[/center]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks again. &lt;br/&gt;Eitan&lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:36:51 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Eitan.Hemed</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Layer objects</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic19721.aspx</link><description>&amp;gt; Can videos overlap in Inquisit? Would it work that way (ordering via stimulusframes)?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yes.</description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:36:51 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Layer objects</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic19713.aspx</link><description>Thanks, i'll try to implement that.&lt;br/&gt;Can videos overlap in Inquisit? Would it work that way (ordering via stimulusframes)?&lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:54:44 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Eitan.Hemed</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Layer objects</title><link>https://forums.millisecond.com/Topic19708.aspx</link><description>Layering wont work like that if the stimulus in the "background" is a video -- the screen area occupied by the video must be constantly refreshed (otherwise there'd be no "moving pictures"), i.e., any *static* stimulus you put in the same area will immediately be overwritten by the video again (the static stimulus would be visible for a single frame, i.e., until that screen area refreshes / gets redrawn the next time for the video to keep playing).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The solution is to *not* use static stimuli here, but to have your "occluder" stimuli to also be &amp;lt;video&amp;gt;s (that just show a black screen for example).&lt;br/&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 07:18:36 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>