Millisecond Forums » Millisecond Forums » Inquisit 5 » converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

gehaffner — Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:52:58 GMT

Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

Dave — Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:52:58 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/15/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/14/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/14/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?
[/quote]

You can leave the <list> elements in the script as they are, nor do you need to remove the references to the list elements in any of the /ontrialend logic. What you need to do, however, is change the <expressions> to calculate the means etc. based on values that you some up in the <trial> element's /ontrialend logic.

I.e.

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = list.accuracy_Category2_C.mean
...
</expressions>

needs to be changed to something like

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = (values.ncorrect_congruent_category2/values.ntotal_congruent_category2)
...
</expressions>

where values.ncorrect_congruent_category2 is the value where you sum up the correct responses in congruent category 2 trials and values.ntotal_congruent_category2 is where you sum up the total number of congruent category 2 trials and so forth.
[/quote]

Thank you so much for this. Below is a bit of what I edited - does this look roughly correct?

/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_congruent_category2/values.count_congruent_category2
/ propcorrect_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_incongruent_category2/values.count_incongruent_category2
/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ AB_category2 = expressions.meanRT_incongruent_category2 - expressions.meanRT_congruent_category2
</expressions>
[/quote]

It does look roughly correct, though I'm not sure about

/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt

If you want to calculate a mean, then you'll want to divide by the number (count) of relevant trials, not by a sum. Of course I can't see what your "values.sumrt" actually is -- i.e. whether it's a count of those trials or -- as the name would seem to imply -- another sum of response latencies. If the latter, that'd be obviously wrong and wouldn't yield a mean.
[/quote]

Ok great! I made some changes and the script when run in inquisit 4 now only has 6 errors, however I am having a hard time interpreting what they mean. I can find them but am not sure what to change. Any ideas? I appreciate it!
[/quote]

There is no such thing as a "nextvalues" property. There is only a "nextvalue" (note:singular) property.

You have a missing statement separator (;) somewhere in <trial category1> and <trial category2>'s /ontrialend logic.

Since you did not share the actual code, I cannot say anything about the last error.
[/quote]

last thing: it runs now in inquisit 4, but the instructions page format is a little bunched up / squished in version 4 than how it appears in version 5. I want to edit the parameters of it so the participants can see it clearly. What should I edit in this section?
[/quote]

<instruct>
/ fontstyle = ("Arial", 2.80%, false, false, false, false, 5, 1)
/ txcolor = black
/ windowsize = (90%, 90%)
</instruct>

https://www.millisecond.com/support/docs/v4/html/language/attributes/windowsize.htm

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

gehaffner — Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:15:16 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/14/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/14/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?
[/quote]

You can leave the <list> elements in the script as they are, nor do you need to remove the references to the list elements in any of the /ontrialend logic. What you need to do, however, is change the <expressions> to calculate the means etc. based on values that you some up in the <trial> element's /ontrialend logic.

I.e.

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = list.accuracy_Category2_C.mean
...
</expressions>

needs to be changed to something like

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = (values.ncorrect_congruent_category2/values.ntotal_congruent_category2)
...
</expressions>

where values.ncorrect_congruent_category2 is the value where you sum up the correct responses in congruent category 2 trials and values.ntotal_congruent_category2 is where you sum up the total number of congruent category 2 trials and so forth.
[/quote]

Thank you so much for this. Below is a bit of what I edited - does this look roughly correct?

/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_congruent_category2/values.count_congruent_category2
/ propcorrect_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_incongruent_category2/values.count_incongruent_category2
/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ AB_category2 = expressions.meanRT_incongruent_category2 - expressions.meanRT_congruent_category2
</expressions>
[/quote]

It does look roughly correct, though I'm not sure about

/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt

If you want to calculate a mean, then you'll want to divide by the number (count) of relevant trials, not by a sum. Of course I can't see what your "values.sumrt" actually is -- i.e. whether it's a count of those trials or -- as the name would seem to imply -- another sum of response latencies. If the latter, that'd be obviously wrong and wouldn't yield a mean.
[/quote]

Ok great! I made some changes and the script when run in inquisit 4 now only has 6 errors, however I am having a hard time interpreting what they mean. I can find them but am not sure what to change. Any ideas? I appreciate it!
[/quote]

There is no such thing as a "nextvalues" property. There is only a "nextvalue" (note:singular) property.

You have a missing statement separator (;) somewhere in <trial category1> and <trial category2>'s /ontrialend logic.

Since you did not share the actual code, I cannot say anything about the last error.
[/quote]

last thing: it runs now in inquisit 4, but the instructions page format is a little bunched up / squished in version 4 than how it appears in version 5. I want to edit the parameters of it so the participants can see it clearly. What should I edit in this section?

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

gehaffner — Wed, 14 Oct 2020 19:49:03 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/14/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/14/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?
[/quote]

You can leave the <list> elements in the script as they are, nor do you need to remove the references to the list elements in any of the /ontrialend logic. What you need to do, however, is change the <expressions> to calculate the means etc. based on values that you some up in the <trial> element's /ontrialend logic.

I.e.

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = list.accuracy_Category2_C.mean
...
</expressions>

needs to be changed to something like

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = (values.ncorrect_congruent_category2/values.ntotal_congruent_category2)
...
</expressions>

where values.ncorrect_congruent_category2 is the value where you sum up the correct responses in congruent category 2 trials and values.ntotal_congruent_category2 is where you sum up the total number of congruent category 2 trials and so forth.
[/quote]

Thank you so much for this. Below is a bit of what I edited - does this look roughly correct?

/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_congruent_category2/values.count_congruent_category2
/ propcorrect_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_incongruent_category2/values.count_incongruent_category2
/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ AB_category2 = expressions.meanRT_incongruent_category2 - expressions.meanRT_congruent_category2
</expressions>
[/quote]

It does look roughly correct, though I'm not sure about

/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt

If you want to calculate a mean, then you'll want to divide by the number (count) of relevant trials, not by a sum. Of course I can't see what your "values.sumrt" actually is -- i.e. whether it's a count of those trials or -- as the name would seem to imply -- another sum of response latencies. If the latter, that'd be obviously wrong and wouldn't yield a mean.
[/quote]

Ok great! I made some changes and the script when run in inquisit 4 now only has 6 errors, however I am having a hard time interpreting what they mean. I can find them but am not sure what to change. Any ideas? I appreciate it!
[/quote]

There is no such thing as a "nextvalues" property. There is only a "nextvalue" (note:singular) property.

You have a missing statement separator (;) somewhere in <trial category1> and <trial category2>'s /ontrialend logic.

Since you did not share the actual code, I cannot say anything about the last error.
[/quote]

Got it and it works!! Thank you so much for the help.

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

Dave — Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:53:13 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/14/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?
[/quote]

You can leave the <list> elements in the script as they are, nor do you need to remove the references to the list elements in any of the /ontrialend logic. What you need to do, however, is change the <expressions> to calculate the means etc. based on values that you some up in the <trial> element's /ontrialend logic.

I.e.

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = list.accuracy_Category2_C.mean
...
</expressions>

needs to be changed to something like

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = (values.ncorrect_congruent_category2/values.ntotal_congruent_category2)
...
</expressions>

where values.ncorrect_congruent_category2 is the value where you sum up the correct responses in congruent category 2 trials and values.ntotal_congruent_category2 is where you sum up the total number of congruent category 2 trials and so forth.
[/quote]

Thank you so much for this. Below is a bit of what I edited - does this look roughly correct?

/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_congruent_category2/values.count_congruent_category2
/ propcorrect_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_incongruent_category2/values.count_incongruent_category2
/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ AB_category2 = expressions.meanRT_incongruent_category2 - expressions.meanRT_congruent_category2
</expressions>
[/quote]

It does look roughly correct, though I'm not sure about

/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt

If you want to calculate a mean, then you'll want to divide by the number (count) of relevant trials, not by a sum. Of course I can't see what your "values.sumrt" actually is -- i.e. whether it's a count of those trials or -- as the name would seem to imply -- another sum of response latencies. If the latter, that'd be obviously wrong and wouldn't yield a mean.
[/quote]

Ok great! I made some changes and the script when run in inquisit 4 now only has 6 errors, however I am having a hard time interpreting what they mean. I can find them but am not sure what to change. Any ideas? I appreciate it!
[/quote]

There is no such thing as a "nextvalues" property. There is only a "nextvalue" (note:singular) property.

You have a missing statement separator (;) somewhere in <trial category1> and <trial category2>'s /ontrialend logic.

Since you did not share the actual code, I cannot say anything about the last error.

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

gehaffner — Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:37:38 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?
[/quote]

You can leave the <list> elements in the script as they are, nor do you need to remove the references to the list elements in any of the /ontrialend logic. What you need to do, however, is change the <expressions> to calculate the means etc. based on values that you some up in the <trial> element's /ontrialend logic.

I.e.

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = list.accuracy_Category2_C.mean
...
</expressions>

needs to be changed to something like

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = (values.ncorrect_congruent_category2/values.ntotal_congruent_category2)
...
</expressions>

where values.ncorrect_congruent_category2 is the value where you sum up the correct responses in congruent category 2 trials and values.ntotal_congruent_category2 is where you sum up the total number of congruent category 2 trials and so forth.
[/quote]

Thank you so much for this. Below is a bit of what I edited - does this look roughly correct?

/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_congruent_category2/values.count_congruent_category2
/ propcorrect_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_incongruent_category2/values.count_incongruent_category2
/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ AB_category2 = expressions.meanRT_incongruent_category2 - expressions.meanRT_congruent_category2
</expressions>
[/quote]

It does look roughly correct, though I'm not sure about

/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt

If you want to calculate a mean, then you'll want to divide by the number (count) of relevant trials, not by a sum. Of course I can't see what your "values.sumrt" actually is -- i.e. whether it's a count of those trials or -- as the name would seem to imply -- another sum of response latencies. If the latter, that'd be obviously wrong and wouldn't yield a mean.
[/quote]

Ok great! I made some changes and the script when run in inquisit 4 now only has 6 errors, however I am having a hard time interpreting what they mean. I can find them but am not sure what to change. Any ideas? I appreciate it!

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

Dave — Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:19:15 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?
[/quote]

You can leave the <list> elements in the script as they are, nor do you need to remove the references to the list elements in any of the /ontrialend logic. What you need to do, however, is change the <expressions> to calculate the means etc. based on values that you some up in the <trial> element's /ontrialend logic.

I.e.

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = list.accuracy_Category2_C.mean
...
</expressions>

needs to be changed to something like

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = (values.ncorrect_congruent_category2/values.ntotal_congruent_category2)
...
</expressions>

where values.ncorrect_congruent_category2 is the value where you sum up the correct responses in congruent category 2 trials and values.ntotal_congruent_category2 is where you sum up the total number of congruent category 2 trials and so forth.
[/quote]

Thank you so much for this. Below is a bit of what I edited - does this look roughly correct?

/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_congruent_category2/values.count_congruent_category2
/ propcorrect_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_incongruent_category2/values.count_incongruent_category2
/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ AB_category2 = expressions.meanRT_incongruent_category2 - expressions.meanRT_congruent_category2
</expressions>
[/quote]

It does look roughly correct, though I'm not sure about

/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt

If you want to calculate a mean, then you'll want to divide by the number (count) of relevant trials, not by a sum. Of course I can't see what your "values.sumrt" actually is -- i.e. whether it's a count of those trials or -- as the name would seem to imply -- another sum of response latencies. If the latter, that'd be obviously wrong and wouldn't yield a mean.

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

gehaffner — Tue, 13 Oct 2020 02:26:09 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?
[/quote]

You can leave the <list> elements in the script as they are, nor do you need to remove the references to the list elements in any of the /ontrialend logic. What you need to do, however, is change the <expressions> to calculate the means etc. based on values that you some up in the <trial> element's /ontrialend logic.

I.e.

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = list.accuracy_Category2_C.mean
...
</expressions>

needs to be changed to something like

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = (values.ncorrect_congruent_category2/values.ntotal_congruent_category2)
...
</expressions>

where values.ncorrect_congruent_category2 is the value where you sum up the correct responses in congruent category 2 trials and values.ntotal_congruent_category2 is where you sum up the total number of congruent category 2 trials and so forth.
[/quote]

Thank you so much for this. Below is a bit of what I edited - does this look roughly correct?

/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_congruent_category2/values.count_congruent_category2
/ propcorrect_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumcorrect_incongruent_category2/values.count_incongruent_category2
/ meanRT_congruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_congruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ meanRT_incongruent_Category2 = values.sumrt_incongruent_category2/values.sumrt
/ AB_category2 = expressions.meanRT_incongruent_category2 - expressions.meanRT_congruent_category2
</expressions>

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

Dave — Tue, 13 Oct 2020 01:32:41 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?
[/quote]

You can leave the <list> elements in the script as they are, nor do you need to remove the references to the list elements in any of the /ontrialend logic. What you need to do, however, is change the <expressions> to calculate the means etc. based on values that you some up in the <trial> element's /ontrialend logic.

I.e.

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = list.accuracy_Category2_C.mean
...
</expressions>

needs to be changed to something like

<expressions>
...
/ propcorrect_congruent_Category2 = (values.ncorrect_congruent_category2/values.ntotal_congruent_category2)
...
</expressions>

where values.ncorrect_congruent_category2 is the value where you sum up the correct responses in congruent category 2 trials and values.ntotal_congruent_category2 is where you sum up the total number of congruent category 2 trials and so forth.

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

gehaffner — Tue, 13 Oct 2020 01:19:16 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]Dave - 10/13/2020[/b]
+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx

[/quote]

Thank You!

I had a follow-up question. I'm having a hard time determining what to do with the <list> elements. Should expressions and all references to lists be deleted and then redo it under values?

RE: converting inquisit 5 script to inquisit 4

Dave — Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:07:43 GMT

+x[quote]

[b]gehaffner - 10/12/2020[/b]
Hi there,

I am working on a dot probe script and my lab at school only has access to inquisit 4, but the script is in inquisit 5. I have read some of the forums on converting the scripts but am having difficulty getting it to comply. Any tips on getting this script to work on a lower version?
[/quote]

The same things as listed here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic27214.aspx and here https://www.millisecond.com/forums/Topic26082.aspx