Can a missing XID device only give a warning, not throw an error

Back

Home
»
Millisecond Forums
»
Inquisit 4
»
Can a missing XID device only give a warning, not throw an error

Can a missing XID device only give a warning, not throw an error

Author	Message
Blackadder	Blackadder posted 9 Years Ago Topic Details Share Topic
Group: Forum Members Posts: 280, Visits: 147	We only have a limited number of Cedrus response boxes in our lab. Hence, programming and testing of experiments is mostly done on our office computers without a Cedrus device attached. We just add both Cedrus and keyboard codes as valid/correct responses. With Inquisit 3, changing one single line in the <defaults> section of a script allowed to switch between XID devices and keyboard. With the new <xid> element in Inquisit 4 we have to delete the whole XID element to test or run scripts on non-lab computers. It would be nice if Inquisit could throw an XID error only if the xid device was used as an "/ inputdevice" somewhere, and give just a warning message otherwise. Kind regards, Malte
	Reply Like 24
Dave	Dave posted 9 Years Ago ANSWER Post Details Share Post
Group: Administrators Posts: 13K, Visits: 104K	Since the <xid> element allows for interfacing (w/ e.g. a stimtracker) even if the respective device is not designated as inputdevice anywhere in the script, I'm personally not sure whether merely emitting a warning would be advisable. This would open the road to data loss in cases where a device is supposed to be present (i.e. in your "lab" configuration), but Inquisit is unable to communicate with it. One alternative I can think of is to use conditional <include> elements with e.g. a "special" subject id to automatically run your non-lab vs. lab configuration. This would require zero changes to the actual script (minimal example attached; use subject id "test"). Hope this helps. Attachments experiment.iqx (173 views, 355 bytes) labconfig.txt (202 views, 123 bytes) testconfig.txt (202 views, 76 bytes)
	Reply Like 26
Blackadder	Blackadder posted 9 Years Ago ANSWER Post Details Share Post
Group: Forum Members Posts: 280, Visits: 147	This is a great idea! I wasn't aware that conditional include statements were even possible. This solves the problem, indeed with minimal changes. Thanks a lot! Malte
	Reply Like 23