| 
		        
                
 
 
	Group: Forum Members 	        
    Posts: 8, 
    Visits: 39 
    
 
          
		     | 
				                       
                 
                
                    
			            I currently have a study in which participants are directed from Qualtrics, to Inquisit, then back to Qualtrics. Everything is quite seamless, but I have a few issues that I need some help with before I send this out for participants to take part in:
  1. Participants are intended to be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: 
  <batch> / groups=(1 of 2) / file="stroop_deplete.iqx" / file="stroop manipulation instructions.iqx" / file="pasatc.iqx" </batch>
  <batch> / groups=(2 of 2) / file="stroop_nondeplete.iqx" / file="stroop manipulation instructions.iqx" / file="pasatc.iqx" </batch>
  It was recommended to select either Sequential or Random without Replacement for how groupid should be determined, and I have tried both ways (granted, not with a lot of participants) and I would like to know what might be best for what I am trying to do. I notice that most people who I have tried this out on have been assigned to group 1 (only 1/5 people were in group 2). I intend to collect data from ~215 participants, and I would like for the groups to be about even. It may be do to such a small sample, but can anyone tell me the difference between exactly what each option (Sequential or Random without Replacement) would do for my study?
  2. Regarding the subject id--I have my survey broken into 2 parts (one Qualtrics survey for each), and I have my millisecond URL in the first Qualtrics survey set to send subject id. I have checked the data for all parts of my study, and while the first Qualtrics survey and the Inquisit data have matching subject/response id, the second Qualtrics survey has a different response (subject) id than the other two parts. Does anyone know how to make it so that the same ID carries through all 3 parts (Qualtrics-Inquisit-Qualtrics)?   3. Finally, I wonder if there may be a way to make the subject id numerical (and sequential) as opposed to a long alphanumeric string. This may result in a lot to sift through when all of my data is collected.
  Any help is appreciated! Thanks!                
			            				
			                                 
                     
                                            
                         
                    
                  
             |