Orthogonal presentation of materials


Author
Message
AnthonyFCollinsSussex
AnthonyFCollinsSussex
Partner Member (769 reputation)Partner Member (769 reputation)Partner Member (769 reputation)Partner Member (769 reputation)Partner Member (769 reputation)Partner Member (769 reputation)Partner Member (769 reputation)Partner Member (769 reputation)Partner Member (769 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 52, Visits: 250
Hello. I have a remaining outstanding issue that I need to resolve before data collection, and I have been searching for the solution and would just like to double clarify if I am correct before I go ahead with it.

There are two conditions (Positive IBT training or Negative IBT training). In each of these conditions, there is a pre- and post- cognitive bias assessment that assesses cognitive bias before and after the IBT training type - RTA or RTB (Recognition Task). RTA and RTB are both the same test, only differing in material set used (e.g. set A or B). The order with which RTA and RTB are presented pre- and post- training are counterbalanced as can be seen below:

<batch>
/ subjects = (1 of 2)
/ groupassignment = groupnumber
/ file = "RTA.iqx"
/ file = "Positive IBT.iqx"
/ file = "RTB.iqx
</batch>

<batch>
/ subjects = (2 of 2)
/ groupassignment = groupnumber
/ file = "RTB.iqx"
/ file = "Positive IBT.iqx"
/ file = "RTA.iqx
</batch>

HOWEVER,  a random 50% of each training condition need to get RTA followed by RTB, and the other 50% the other way around. Hence material order is orthogonal to condition. In my data output, I would need information about which material set (e.g. RTA or RTB) were encountered first for each participant. I will eventually create in excel columns denoting something like  'material order' (0 = RTA first, 1 = RTB first), 'first RT score' (regardless of material type) 'second RT score' (regardless of material type). I can do these last parts independently, but the way I was going to approach this design set-up was to simply do the following:


// order RTA -> Positive IBT -> RTB
<batch>
/ subjects = (1 of 4)
/ groupassignment = groupnumber
/ file = "RTA.iqx"
/ file = "Positive IBT.iqx"
/ file = "RTB.iqx
</batch>

// order RTA -> Control IBT -> RTB
<batch>
/ subjects = (2 of 4)
/ groupassignment = groupnumber
/ file = "RTA.iqx"
/ file = "Positive IBT.iqx"
/ file = "RTB.iqx
</batch>

// order RTB -> Positive IBT -> RTA
<batch>
/ subjects = (3 of 4)
/ groupassignment = groupnumber
/ file = "RTB.iqx"
/ file = "Positive IBT.iqx"
/ file = "RTA.iqx
</batch>

// order RTB -> Control IBT -> RTA
<batch>
/ subjects = (4 of 4)
/ groupassignment = groupnumber
/ file = "RTB.iqx"
/ file = "Positive IBT.iqx"
/ file = "RTA.iqx
</batch>


As mentioned though, a random 50% of each training condition must get RTA followed by RTB, and the other 50% the other way around. I just need to check if this strategy is correct.

Yours Sincerely
Anthony





GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
AnthonyFCollinsSussex - 3 Years Ago
Dave - 3 Years Ago
AnthonyFCollinsSussex - 3 Years Ago
Dave - 3 Years Ago
AnthonyFCollinsSussex - 3 Years Ago
AnthonyFCollinsSussex - 3 Years Ago
                         If you select random (without replacement) group number generation in...
Dave - 3 Years Ago
                             Sounds like this set-up achieves what we need it to, in other words...
AnthonyFCollinsSussex - 3 Years Ago
                                 > in other words participant 1 could be assigned to any one of the...
Dave - 3 Years Ago
                                     This is very useful to know thank you (in fact vital to know), I will...
AnthonyFCollinsSussex - 3 Years Ago
                                     Hello Dave I hope you are well and that you have had a pleasant week...
AnthonyFCollinsSussex - 3 Years Ago
                                         I fail to see any issue here. As explained previously, any visit to...
Dave - 3 Years Ago
                                             It just looks as though for example condition 4 is always being landed...
AnthonyFCollinsSussex - 3 Years Ago

Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search