RE: Rotation attribute prevents whole stimuli being erased

Back

Home
»
Millisecond Forums
»
Inquisit 6
»
RE: Rotation attribute prevents whole stimuli being erased

Rotation attribute prevents whole stimuli being erased

Author	Message
Georgia859	Georgia859 posted 4 Years Ago Topic Details Share Topic
Group: Forum Members Posts: 7, Visits: 59	If I use a shape with no rotation, on the following trial it is erased as expected, but adding in any rotation (even changing the rotation attribute from 0 to 1) means that the whole shape is no longer erased and can be seen on following trials. Does anyone know how to deal with this? Many thanks. Code attached. Attachments rotation_question.iqx (164 views, 1.00 KB)
	Reply Like 2
Dave	Dave posted 4 Years Ago ANSWER Post Details Share Post
Group: Administrators Posts: 13K, Visits: 105K	+x Georgia859 - 6/22/2021 If I use a shape with no rotation, on the following trial it is erased as expected, but adding in any rotation (even changing the rotation attribute from 0 to 1) means that the whole shape is no longer erased and can be seen on following trials. Does anyone know how to deal with this? Many thanks. Code attached. Which Inquisit version are you using, because I am not seeing that under the current version 6.4.2? If you're using an outdated version, please update and check if the problem persists.
	Reply Like 3
Georgia859	Georgia859 posted 4 Years Ago ANSWER Post Details Share Post
Group: Forum Members Posts: 7, Visits: 59	+x Dave - 6/22/2021 +x Georgia859 - 6/22/2021 If I use a shape with no rotation, on the following trial it is erased as expected, but adding in any rotation (even changing the rotation attribute from 0 to 1) means that the whole shape is no longer erased and can be seen on following trials. Does anyone know how to deal with this? Many thanks. Code attached. Which Inquisit version are you using, because I am not seeing that under the current version 6.4.2? If you're using an outdated version, please update and check if the problem persists. Problem solved, thank you!
	Reply Like 3