Attribute by SubjectID


Author
Message
mbirk
mbirk
Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19, Visits: 1



Hi,


 


I’m working on an IAT project using milliseconds. Basically,
I modified the example file for “IAT with Item provided by Participant” from
the Inquisit Task Library (https://www.millisecond.com/download/library/v4/IAT/CustomItemIAT/CustomItemIAT.iqx).


 


I have three different sets of attributes, the rest of the
test stays constant. Attributes and compatible/incompatible order should be assigned
by subject.


 


Right now the expt looks like this:


---


<expt>


/subjects = (1 of 2)


/groupassignment = groupnumber


/ blocks = [1=getTargetItems; 2=targetcompatiblepractice;
3=attributepractice; 4=compatibletest1;


                                                                5=compatibletestinstructions;
6=compatibletest2; 7=targetincompatiblepractice; 8=incompatibletest1;


                                                                9=incompatibletestinstructions;
10=incompatibletest2]


---


 


I understand that I have to modify /subjects to (1 of 6) and
assign the different blocks, but if I do so, from my understanding, I also have
to duplicate the whole experimental setup by condition. But the only thing I
want to change is the used attributes depending on the /subject-id.


 


Is there a more elegant solution for that problem?


 


Thanks,


 


Max



Dave
Dave
Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)
Group: Administrators
Posts: 13K, Visits: 108K

You can use the <variables> element to substitute elements between-subjects. Or you can use conditional logic via event attributes, <values> and <expressions> if that's more to your liking.


mbirk
mbirk
Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19, Visits: 1

Thanks for the quick response!


I give that a try.


Thanks again,



max


mbirk
mbirk
Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19, Visits: 1

Hi Dave,


that works fine for labels, but for attributesI get two errors for every block "Could not locate element 'XXX'." and "trial 2 is unassigned.".


Max





mbirk
mbirk
Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19, Visits: 1

go it. needs the item. in front. Thanks for your work. I appreciate it.


mbirk
mbirk
Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19, Visits: 1

I have to correct myself. The error is gone, but the output is empty.


Dave
Dave
Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)
Group: Administrators
Posts: 13K, Visits: 108K

Without (a) the relevant code and (b) the exact error messages I cannot possibly tell you where the mistake may be.


mbirk
mbirk
Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19, Visits: 1

I attached the file.There is no error, but the attributes are empty on the screen. If I use <variables> without item. I get an unassigned trial error.



The relevant part are:



<item attributeA>

</item>

<item attributeArelatedness>
/1 = "Included"
/2 = "Connected"
/3 = "Attached"
/4 = "Integrated"
/5 = "Involved"
/6 = "Belong"
/7 = "Wanted"
/8 = "Integrated"
</item>



and



<variables>
/group=(1 of 2) (attributeAlabel=attributeAlabelRelatedness, attributeBlabel=attributeBlabelRelatedness,  item.attributeA=item.attributeArelatedness, item.attributeB=item.attributeBrelatedness)
/group=(2 of 2) (attributeAlabel=attributeAlabelCompetence, attributeBlabel=attributeBlabelCompetence, item.attributeA=item.attributeAcompetence, item.attributeB=item.attributeBcompetence)
</variables>




Attachments
RelatednessV2.rar (102 views, 4.00 KB)
Dave
Dave
Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)Supreme Being (1M reputation)
Group: Administrators
Posts: 13K, Visits: 108K

See the revisions in the attached file.


Attachments
RelatednessV2.iqx (100 views, 21.00 KB)
mbirk
mbirk
Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)Esteemed Member (1.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19, Visits: 1

I see. I have to set directly the source of the items and not replacing one source with another. makes sense. thanks


GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search