showing randomly paired stimuli again in a second round in the same combination


showing randomly paired stimuli again in a second round in the same...
Author
Message
AKathryn
AKathryn
Partner Member (785 reputation)Partner Member (785 reputation)Partner Member (785 reputation)Partner Member (785 reputation)Partner Member (785 reputation)Partner Member (785 reputation)Partner Member (785 reputation)Partner Member (785 reputation)Partner Member (785 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4, Visits: 22

Dear Inquisit community,

I am currently desingning an experiment in which participants have to evaluate fictional project partners (in terms of how much they would like to work with that person). I am presenting several potential partners, and always show a picture next to a short CV. Attractiveness in the picture varies as well as the competence of the person as suggested in the CV. In the end, the task should measure the value a person places on attractiveness as compared to the competence of a person. Picture and CV are paired randomly, so that every participant gets a different „set“ of potentional project partners.
Now the challenge: After showing all the pictures of all project partners, randomly paired with CVs and asking everytime how much the participant would like to work with that person, I want to do ANOTHER round of showing the same pictures paired with the same CVs as before, this time asking the participant how attractive and how competent they perceive the person as a manipulation check.
Here is my question: Is it somehow possible for Inquisit to track which combination it randomly showed before and to show this exact combination again in the second round?

Thank you so much for your help!
Best,
Kathryn


GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
AKathryn - 9 Years Ago
Dave - 9 Years Ago
AKathryn - 9 Years Ago
Dave - 9 Years Ago
AKathryn - 9 Years Ago
                         Several problems. #1: Your <list> definitions make no sense (no...
Dave - 9 Years Ago
                             Thanks so much!! It's working now. You just made my day :)
AKathryn - 9 Years Ago
lir1995 - 3 Years Ago
Dave - 3 Years Ago
lir1995 - 3 Years Ago
Dave - 3 Years Ago
                         There's a bunch of stuff in the code you posted that does not make...
Dave - 3 Years Ago
                         Thank you so much! That definitely makes sense that I do not need that...
lir1995 - 3 Years Ago
                             *Edit, I figured out number two is because I need to add more values....
lir1995 - 3 Years Ago
                                 ****Edit****** I apologize I didn't see your second reply, this all...
lir1995 - 3 Years Ago

Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search