A few things not working properly. And flicker.


Author
Message
Blackadder
Blackadder
Supreme Being (29K reputation)Supreme Being (29K reputation)Supreme Being (29K reputation)Supreme Being (29K reputation)Supreme Being (29K reputation)Supreme Being (29K reputation)Supreme Being (29K reputation)Supreme Being (29K reputation)Supreme Being (29K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 280, Visits: 147

Hi All,


consider the attached script. There are a few things not functional here.



(1) Fixation cross flickers between trials TRIAL_refset and TRIAL_probe.


There is not a single "erase=true" statement in the entire script. However, the fixation cross (or text in this demo script) flickers at the switch between TRIAL_refset and TRIAL_probe. Since we are doing an EEG experiment, the flicker yields EEG activity which we'd rather avoid.



(2) A second port stimulus in trial TRIAL_refset has no effect.


Issue (1) could be circumvented by integrating TRIAL_refset and TRIAL_probe into one trial. The latter should look like


<trial TRIAL_refset>
/ iscorrectresponse = [((values.iIdent==0) && (trial.TRIAL_probe.response==203))||((values.iIdent==1) && (trial.TRIAL_probe.response==205))]
/ responseinterrupt = trial
/ responsetime = 2250
/ responsetrial = (anyresponse, TRIAL_response)
/ responsetrial = (noresponse, TRIAL_response)
/ stimulustimes = [0 = SHAPE_blank,PIC_fix,TEXT_debugstring;
1500=PORT_refset,PIC_ref_p01,PIC_ref_p02,PIC_fix; 3000=SHAPE_blank,PIC_fix; 4500=PORT_probe,SHAPE_blank,PIC_ref_p03; 5250=SHAPE_blank]
/ timeout = 8250
/ validresponse = (203,205,noresponse)
</trial>


Unfortunately, PORT_probe is not set in this case.



(3) Inquisit allows only for some none-consecutive numbers in an <item>.


The port triggers need to be computed at runtime since they encode some important trial properties. Since I wasn't aware of a way to send integer values to a port, I decided to realize a translation table "integer -> binary" via an item. The various integer codes used throughout the script are not consecutive, hence I originally planned to define the <item> like this:


<item ITEM_portsignals>
/  1 = "00000001"
/  2 = "00000010"
/  3 = "00000011"
/ 11 = "00001011"
/ 12 = "00001100"
/ 13 = "00001101"
/ 14 = "00001110"
/ 15 = "00001111"
/ 16 = "00010000"
/ 21 = "00010101"
/ 22 = "00010110"
/ 23 = "00010111"
/ 24 = "00011000"
/ 25 = "00011001"
/ 26 = "00011010"
/ 31 = "01101111"
/ 32 = "01110000"
/ 33 = "01110001"
/ 34 = "01110010"
/ 35 = "01110011"
/ 36 = "01110100"
/ 41 = "01111001"
/ 42 = "01111010"
/ 43 = "01111011"
/ 44 = "01111100"
/ 45 = "01111101"
/ 46 = "01111110"
</item>


Inquisit does not issue an error when I do so. During runtime, while the following expressions work:


getitem(ITEM_portsignals,1)
getitem(ITEM_portsignals,11)
getitem(
ITEM_portsignals,26)


these do not but issue a script error:


getitem(ITEM_portsignals,31)
getitem(ITEM_portsignals,46)



Any clues on any of these?


Bye, Malte.


Attachments
FaceWatch_WorkMem_EEG_test.exp (1.1K views, 18.00 KB)
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
Blackadder - 16 Years Ago
Dave - 16 Years Ago
Dave - 16 Years Ago
Blackadder - 16 Years Ago
Blackadder - 16 Years Ago
                     [quote]Dave, you've once again been helpful[/quote]
I live to...
Dave - 16 Years Ago
Blackadder - 16 Years Ago
                         [quote]But since this is coming from you, I have good faith[/quote]...
Dave - 16 Years Ago
                             Hi Dave,
not yet. I got no access to the gadget that's recording...
Blackadder - 16 Years Ago
                                 [quote]Since I wasn't aware of a way to send integer
values to a...
Dave - 16 Years Ago
                         Any progress / new insights regarding the port issue?
~Dave
Dave - 16 Years Ago

Reading This Topic

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search